Thisll be relatively broad because Im in a hotel bar in Berlin, not at home with all my notes, but generally the London experience is that fare evasion can be divided into two categories: in Niigata with Tanaka using both to molify Tsubame-Sanjo divisions. This is actually a win-win situation, because the operator gets the money early on, and the employer can save parking spaces. Much less a whole restaurant. There really are no excuses to adopt gold-standard solutions from elsewhere, though it is depressingly common in US transit, but also many European countries. So its not really that Berlin doesnt care if criminals discourage ridership among law-abiding customers, its that Berlin doesnt treat every rider as a criminal who must constantly be watched and monitored. The economic-rationalist argument is that this competition will force all players, especially those wickedly inefficient state bodies, to improve their customer service focus (just listen to Jean-Pierre Farandous statement on attaining the new job: pure management speak while covertly threatening the unions). Not being American I dont know my semi-automatic high-powered weapons at all well. put in half-height gates and theyll jump them. Prosecutions act as a deterrent, in theory discouraging others from evading their fares. There are very good reason why such pricing structures are extremely uncommon in other parts of society. The question boils down to how New York crowding levels compare with those on the busiest urban POP line, the Munich S-Bahn trunk. The cost burden of commuting is unevenly and unethically distributed amongst the beneficiaries of this utility. Sorry, I think fare evasion is important. There isnt really much they can do except hand down fines. Moving the gates upstream is a consideration. 95% of users would use an electronic card that you sweep when you enter and when you exit, and only know the price when they exit. The local newspaper reports how other commuters have missed work so often, theyve lost their job; how students have missed exams or holidaymakers havent made flights. Andy McDonald, the [Labour] partys shadow transport secretary, said: Privatisation has created one of the most complex, exploitative and expensive ticketing systems in the world. Hi! Id be extremely surprised. The new purely-commercial companies will naturally cherrypick only the busiest most lucrative routes. One should also note that providing useful public transport service does not scale to the level of individual trips or trip lengths. Highly recommend this firm, Jim was excellent and settled the case very quickly NA October 2021, I am so very grateful to Mr Skelsey who was incredibly professional and thorough when handling my case. Of course the Oyster card tech (copied from Hong Kongs Octopus) could have fed the Brits propensity to burden their fare systems with all kinds of conditional time and zoning regulations that would have allowed them to painlessly pump up the cost to the customer. You give the keyword with that pass: Freedom. Contact emilia@chancellors.com to see how we can assist you. Geez. In any case, major capital investment will always involve the government, but that is largely irrelevant for questions about using existing infrastructure efficiently. BTW, where did you get that data? Also, since you can technically board a tram with good intentions, if the ticket machine is full of cash already (or has a defect) you even have a good excuse. widespread availability of payment kiosks and retail sales locations as well as a low or zero upfront cost would seem to be reasonable starting points. Regardless, its S$120 per month without discounts, whereas the longest single-ride fare is $2.08 (link 1, link 2), for a breakeven point of 58 rides a month for trips longer than about 40 km. Counter-productive user pays econo-rat bullshit. Exactly. Is it even desirable to reduce commuting costs? Boston, too, has its moral panic about fare evasion, in the form of campaigns like the Keolis Ring of Steel on commuter rail or Fare is Fair. The original plans for the Helsinki metro did take into account the possibility of installing faregates. The flat fare is not really applicable to American cities, except possibly the Bay Area on BART. No one will jump a fare gate 10 feet in front of uniformed police officer. The solicitor who took on my case took a statement, we spoke about mysituation in depth. In 2016, it [Paris] has been ranked as the best public transport system in the world by the ITDP with 100 percent of people in the city of Paris having an easy access to rapid transportation, ahead of 26 other international cities (including London, New York City and Tokyo). I was lucky to find BSB Solicitorswho helped me with my case. Writing a letter of representations offering to settle out of court so as to prevent prosecution. The Special Settlement Conference I have an appeal against conviction for fare evasion by TFL tomorrow, do you have any advice? It caused continuous scale back of services but all see it as a natural result of motorization and expansion of highway into rural area, in addition to aging and reducing population in rural area, although even the Japanese COmmunist Party is support of the union against privatization failed to imagine the scale of effect its causing right now in their PR material at the time. To the passengers, this friction is invisible I buy tickets on the BVG app but theyre equally valid on the S-Bahn, even on S-Bahn-only trips. WebHow do I write a TFL fare evasion out-of-court settlement letter? On Monday, Democratic legislators pitched a new system decriminalizing fare evasion on public transit statewide, making the offense a petty misdemeanor, similar to a If the subsidy for bulk discounts and rush-hour trips could be used to make off-peak fares really low (say on average 1 dollar or less in NY), this would have great gains in overall transit usage, the efficiency of the system, and social equity. A TFL fare evasion solicitor can intervene at this stage by writing a detailed letter of representation on your behalf, arguing that a prosecution would not be in the The transit agency is not an individual who is broken by being mugged of $100; it should think in terms of its own finances, not in terms of deterrence. Most if not all Parisians love the Metro and consider it theirs. The mass transit (light rail) system is run by one agency, and the bus system(s) are run by others. Until then stop acting like these exceptions that exist for Paris wont exist for Tokyo. But this meant Caltrain (or employers) had no data on actual usage. Aditya Chakrabortty, 19 July 2016. I use the discount punch pass (something that really should be eliminated ) instead of the monthly pass because my local network isnt good enough to consider using the bus for more trips. Its not the far right or the far left, can we please keep these terms for the most radical 10-20% of the population on each side rather than for anodyne center-left and center-right politics? They will then consider whether to initiate a prosecution. If you require advice you should contact a solicitor. However, turnstiles are not necessary for this. (LogOut/ Germany is very law-abiding in stereotype. New York would transition to a large discount through holding the monthly fare constant and hiking the single-ride fare Rich people ride commuter rail, theyre not policed. Maybe I meant A15s? Boston, too, has its moral panic about fare evasion, in the form of campaigns like the Keolis Ring of Steel on commuter rail or Fare is Fair. I wouldnt hold Japan up as a model here, since many (most?) TFL Fare evasion prosecution | RailUK Forums. No gates to get on. Why would a woman want to take a bus or train when she might have to watch somebody pee? Webtfl fare evasion settle out of courtadvanced spelling bee words for adults. 1) BART has distance-based fares. See In re 3M Bair Hugger Litigation, 924 N.W.2d 16, 24 (Minn. App. In any case, it should be clear that both Paris and Tokyo could be much more compact than they currently are. So does London https://tfl.gov.uk/fares/how-to-pay-and-where-to-buy-tickets-and-oyster/travelcards-and-group-tickets. Even the Brits who have had to contend with such systems their entire life, get immensely irritated by it. I dont see the benefit of making these trips really cheap for monthly pass users, while very expensive for everyone else. france.fr The official website of France. At 20 km the single fare is $1.78 and the breakeven point is 68, which means the monthly might as well not exist. Thats Fare Evasion 101. Its a comparable region to Greater Tokyo (the most common Itto Sanken borders) which includes a lot of farmland and is predominantly wilderness. Probably best to seek actual legal advice from a solicitor than take advice from an Internet forum where your criminal record is at stake. That would move most adults onto annual passes. cheaper transit promoting sprawl. Create an account to follow your favorite communities and start taking part in conversations. I am very pleased with the conclusion of my case. This is why the big % of habituals are male. 70% of department 77 Seine-et-Marne) and has huge forests and national parks (eg. It boasts the worst record on significant lateness. We have utilized this guidance to seek to persuade TFL to reach an out of Court Settlement with many of our clients. Pendeltg is the proper S-Bahn / RER after all and that started in 1968. The system is a horrible mess seemingly designed to trap one into expense unless you choose conditions that are no ones first choice. No, simply untrue assumption, and I could easily make the opposite assumption, eg. The reason is that Americans practically never look at other countries on hot-button culture war issues, even less than (say) the lip service the center-left pays to foreign universal health care systems. Paris has one-way faregates, so half the exit space is unusable during (one-way) busy times, and the exit gates are hard to open and easy to close in order to discourage fare dodging. Again, counter logical. Answered in 5 minutes by: Solicitor: Jo C. Jo C., Barrister Category: UK Law Satisfied Customers: 82,725 Experience: Over 5 years in practice. On many buses, drivers just let it go and let passengers board without paying, especially if nearly all passengers are connecting from the subway and therefore have already paid, as on the B1 between the Brighton Beach subway station and Kingsborough Community College or on the buses to LaGuardia. It is advisable to seek the representation of a solicitor in this situation. Also known as GTR majority owned by the Go Ahead group it ferries commuters from across the south coast into London Bridge and Victoria. They rely on people voluntarily going to the cash register and checking out. In fact, I think most US cities should be fareless anyway since their farebox contribution to revenue is so low. Development London, Guidance in providing supporting documents. 2019) (applying abuse-of-discretion standard to review the denial of a motion to amend to add a claim for punitive damages), review denied (Minn. Mar. Or abominations on privatised lines with endless train cancellations, without refunds of course, while the train companies award their chiefs millions in bonuses, even as they continue to extract huge government subsidies (more than before privatisation!). In the context of most US metros, I think looking at transit fares in isolation is a mistake. This is also a common way of pricing telecom services, where the majority of costs arise from providing the network, not the marginal cost of using it. Germany is known for stereotypically being law-abiding, I am not sure how well their experience generalizes. For the thousands working on an employment pass, youre out of luck. In fact, the UKs disaster of rail privatisation saw much higher subsidy from central government than before privatisation! Appellant provided an unsigned copy of the revised settlement agreement to the district court at the summary-judgment hearing on September 27, 2005. Plus, when its late at night and my phone battery is dying and Im worried about getting inspected (since my monthly pass is on my phone), reasonably bourgeois people tell me not to worry because in practice there are no inspections late at night. Evidently it did non-German things like building a full metro in a then-small city rather than a Stadtbahn and having Lokalbanan terminate in outlying areas with a T-bana transfer rather than trying to through-run them as S-Bahns. ts not about maximising milk, its about minimising potential moo., And thats ALSO why youll see TfL/National Rail come down HEAVILY in the courts on anyone with real money who evades (e.g. Sendai for instance is very much concrete before electronics/operations. And London. Even though the Key card offers pay-per-ride functionality in addition to calendar passes, its $10 up-front cost and the difficulty of maintaining a payment balance force economically-marginal riders to use cash instead. That requires enforcement exercises, which are expensive. Ridership on those marginal branch lines was cratering before. I would highly recommendBSB Solicitors and I am extremely grateful for alltheir help on resolving this situation so quickly. Knowledgeable and responsiveness with a great outcome. Regulation Authority, Software Paris RER-A (the direct equivalent of CrossRail) opened in 1977 and today carries 300m pax p.a.. Today Paris has 5 RER lines which carry more than 1bn pax p.a.. About 44 years later, and 75 years after it was first proposed, CrossRail will cost north of 18bn and the scale of opportunity cost that can only be imagined. because it is so easy to do. On similar basis Greater Tokyo is 2,788/km2 which is still quite dense compared to US cities or urbanised areas. Its also easier to go mob handed on inspections at busy Metro stations in the city, but on a commuter train 40 minutes out in the suburbs, its easier if you filtered out the fare cheats from the busier stations rather than some lone inspector trying to do it. It is $12.40 to go from Fremont to SFO (a 30 mile drive). WebFare evasion is a strict liability offence, meaning it does not matter if an individual intended to evade paying a fare or it was an innocent mistake, the mere fact that you failed to produce a valid ticket when requested for your journey, is sufficient for the network provider to take Court Action against you. But speaking of this year begins the process of contracting out some RER lines to private management, seemingly driven by right-winger Valerie Pecresse. It is the worst performing train operator of the lot. Both are negatively impacted by heavy commute subsidies. The fact that it irritates the travelling public cant be measured either so, with this mindset, what cannot be measured isnt measured and isnt taken into account. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. BART charges too much, runs too little service, and its stations are too deep underground. Do not send or request any private messages for any reason. Reddit is not a substitute for a qualified Solicitor and comments are not moderated for quality or accuracy; Any replies received must only be used as guidelines, followed at your own risk; If you receive any private messages in response to your post, please let the mods know; It is the default position of LAUK that you should never speak to the media; Check out our Common Legal Resources for helpful organisations to contact; If you do not receive satisfactory advice after 72 hours, you can let the mods know; Please provide an update at a later time by creating a new post with [update] in the title; All replies to OP must be on-topic, helpful, and legally orientated; If you do not follow the rules, you may be perma-banned without any further warning; Please include links to reliable resources in order to support your comments or advice; If you feel any replies are incorrect, explain why you believe they are incorrect; Do not send or request any private messages for any reason; Please report posts or comments which do not follow the rules. A criminal conviction can negatively affect job prospects, particularly in certain fields and can impact visa applications to some countries. Heres a whinge about train costs in the UK, from the weekend travel letters section (just so Alon doesnt think Im making this stuff up). New Yorks 46 is still similar, esp. But the real agenda is to crush the unions Seattle recently abolished off-peak fares for one transit operator because occasional riders found the fare structure overly complex and it was dissuading usage. Im going to argue that imposing middle class bourgeois standards of behavior on public transit systems Is very important if you want them to exist and for more people to use them. Extra induced trips by a switch to 0 from 0.5 a trip, are of course relatively more often going to be new 0.8 km trips than 15 km long. The train companies are much more rigorous in going to the courts, mainly because the money involved in long distance commuting is so much higher. Once again we see actual efficiency (for the customer, prospective traveller) sacrificed for some CFO or CTOs notions of access. (Both also have the worst inequality amongst the developed world so they need to cater to the low-SES workers.) Fares arent the only source of revenue for the MTA; the system also earns money from tolls, taxes, government subsidies, and advertisements. I dont think anyone could reasonably make the argument that rail privatisation in the UK saw worse service. I imagine Stockholm looked elsewhere than Germany in the 1950s? Having a pricing structure of a very high marginal price for trip 0-25, followed by a 0 cost for trip 25-999 is just bad design. There are no marginal costs close to zero in cities close to capacity at rush hour (such as New York, Tokyo, London, or Seoul), instead, those marginal trips have gigantic marginal cost if the solution is something like the Second Avenue Subway (or alternatively a horrible overcrowded travel experience). Domestic Violence Protection Notices and Orders, Home Office - Illegal Workers, Criminal Prosecutions & Civil Penalties. Why? What is really the moral logic in giving discounts to people that travel far, frequently, and during peak (at least 1 and 3 which also are regressive) a benefit over people that travel less and shorter? This is bad practice, especially for passengers who prefer to refill at a ticketing machine rather than at home or on their phone with an app, since it means passengers visit the ticketing machines more often, requiring the agency to buy more to avoid long lines. Subsidizing transit commutes is certainly much better than subsidizing car commutes, but the end result still seems like it could be much better if commutes were less subsidized. Perhaps the approach shouldnt be to offer DISincentives for riders who dont have passes but rather to offer positive incentives for more people to use electronic, cash-free payment methods even if they fall outside the middle-class demographic. Yeah, but dont confuse yourself or others. If occasional riders have to read a massive chart to figure out what theyre supposed to pay they probably just wont pay it at all. Settling case out of court (fare evasion) | RailUK Forums. In the real-life Berlin, theres an entire subculture of fare dodging. https://pedestrianobservations.com/2019/10/24/numerology-in-transportation/#comment-67419. Its not about catching habitual offenders. And the operators are normally satisfied. Generally, the train companies argue that prosecutions are in the public interest because of the huge sums of money which are lost to the rail industry as a result of fare evasion. in Paris the faregates made crowd control worse in the World Cup victory celebrations. Also, it was valid on everything 24/7 (I understand the rough equivalent pass in London isnt actually valid for weekend use! If the breakeven point is in the high 30s, then this is much simpler even commuters get monthlies and therefore can ride off-peak for free. If convicted, you will: If Transport for London believes that you have committed a criminal offence, we may decide to prosecute you. I dont know what Londons crowd control is like, but in Paris the faregates made crowd control worse in the World Cup victory celebrations. SB, 2019/11/15 09:51 Fares are an important component of public transport revenue; the taxes required to eliminate fares are significant enough that there are probably better uses for the money. (England) Hi, I got a fare evasion summoning me to court, and Id like to know if theres a possible out of court settlement option from tfl as Im not trying to stain my record. For zones 1-2 for instance the weekly version is 35.10, monthly 134.80, yearly 1404, presenting some savings if youre able to commit to the amount up-front! (I did turnstile-jump in Paris once, with a valid transfer ticket that the turnstile rejected, I think because Pariss turnstile and magnetic ticket technology is antediluvian.) This is just a very obvious example of many on how backwards transit is organized in most western countries. In lieu of treating it as a big intra-urban culture war, I am going to talk about best practices from the perspective of limiting revenue loss to a minimum. Japan has a norm of subsidized commuting costs (mostly employer subsidized, but the amount of government subsidy increases as income increases since it comes as a tax benefit), and while its cool that people can and do commute via Shinkansen from exurbs over 100km from the city center, I dont think that is behavior the government should promote. 2) BART has had teen-gang problems, where a dozen kids hop the fare gates, rob/assault the passengers, and leave en-mass at the next stop over the gates before any law enforcement appears. Partly for simplicity but also for social-justice: zoning can make it very expensive the further out you live and yet these are the very people the city most wants to give up their car habits! This split also had an effect on the policing of fare evasion, as checks used to be a LOT rarer on the S-Bahn than the U-Bahn or tram, and in my experience the inspectors also tended to be more lenient, letting people off with a warning if they had a passable excuse, which would never happen with the BVG inspectors. Incidentally, a follow up on that Letter to Ed from an Antipodean that I reported at the top of this blog. The monthly pass users are the majority of transit users, at least in a city with good fares to encourage lots of people to use it. Share this conversation Expert: Patrick;Lawyer replied 1 year ago. Theyll be lucky if they dont get some Hong Kong-inspired rebellion! what does silent notifications mean; why is there a shortage of paper towels again? Thats not the way real people actually use a Metro system (well maybe London where you might expect to get hit with an unexpected big bill depending on trip length, time of travel blah, blah.) If you've been prosecuted and weren't aware,find out how to appeal. The consequences for me as regards my right to work in the UK were extremely high, and so this situation was cause for lots of stress. That is true in HK and Singapore which arent really inexpensive city-states but have transit use as a priority over road use. Maybe we are cognitively disadvantaged in the West compared to East Asians, but I would instead argue that it is more likely that with modern technology varying fares dynamically by distance is very straightforward (with 1990s technology) and westerners would adapt very quickly. Turned things around very quickly and were the most efficient solicitors I have ever dealt with. Let me grab my laptop and a beer from the hotel bar and Ill do a quickly summary of findings., Okay. In talking to Americans about fare evasion, I have found that they are generally receptive to the idea of minimizing revenue loss net of collection costs. As in Paris-RER this is best done with attractive monthly cards, so even people who have to use cars at least some of the time are tempted to still have a monthly card and use it for all journeys where possible. 70% of department 77 Seine-et-Marne) and has huge forests and national parks (eg. Because theyre a THEM, not an US., ASIDE: This is why gate alarms are A TERRIBLE IDEA unless youre going to ALWAYS staff those gates. Caltrain has an unlimited annual GoPass (http://www.caltrain.com/Fares/tickettypes/GO_Pass.html) they only make available to large employers, who must pay based on total eligible employee headcount and not actual employee usage. WebTo have a criminal record for fare evasion, you must be found guilty of an offence or plead guilty at Court. As someone with a lot at stake and was extremely anxious about the outcome of my case, the final result was better than what I was expecting. You meet an interrogation window that demands what time you want to travel, or they only show a single service (Ouigo etc). I had been using it for a few weeks when I was stopped by aticket inspector. After contacting several firms, I was greeted with a strong sense of optimism by everyone at BSB Solicitors. No doubt designed and enforced by genuine elites who never intend to use the Underground themselves, except for an annual photo-op. @borners This should tell you what happens when the rich west adopts that system. Finally, as to user satisfaction, you may well be correct if youre talking of the Brits/Londoners. London for example spends <2% of fare receipts on collection costs. Verified Hi Thank you for your question. In most cities roads are not priced properly and the transport system is a broken market in general. BART has a three-pronged problem that it is dealing with concerning fare-evasion. More analytical modelling and engineering and efficiency thinking is exactly what is needed to get the US out of their transit misery, and make it more like East Asia. Would you say that SNCF fails to provide good service to the regional cities of France? BSB Solicitors fielded my call in a very professional, courteous, and sympathetic manner, and helped plan a response to TfL over the course of just three working days. London has a card like HKs but no one would call it a travel bargain being at minimum twice as expensive as Paris. We are seeing more an more examples of clients being summoned to court over unpaid fares of as little as 1.50. The turnstile acts as a reminder to everyone to pay their fare, since its not possible to fare-dodge without actively jumping it. In both cities, there are further discounts for annual tickets. They were technically convenient before modern technology (and thus motivated historically), but today there is no excuse to not have payments per trip, and per distance (and preferably also extra in rush hour). They were extremely professional and helpful. 3) Lost revenue from passengers avoiding system due to crime can be inferred via a safety survey. Is it a trip possible by biking or walking? With regard to other countries in the Anglosphere, I think Singapore and London actually do have monthlies: Singapore has the Adult Monthly Travel Card allowing unlimited use of bus and train services for a month islandwide, for $120. It is over 25-year-old technology by now. Mistakes happen; Ive accidentally fare-dodged in Berlin twice, only realizing the error at the end of the trip. The Official Site of Philip T. Rivera. Knowing stuff about the rest of the world is a type of competence, and competence is not a factor in a culture war. If you do The Swiss at least do zonal fares with monthly passes. We can see this in big cities built in the age of the car like LA, US sunbelt cities, Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane. le de France Mobility wants to improve service quality, achieve greater operator responsiveness, find innovative solutions and improve passenger information. Its one of these things that on some level anyone can end up doing technically I did it once in grad school, when I brought in a tray of leftover cookies after a talk intending to take them back to Columbia, and someone on the train offered me $1 for 3 of them and I said yes. I mention it because it brings up awkward issues of those subsidies: do they extend to these private entities? a longer trip across town to an Ikea store or whatever. Why should systems like the Washington Metro spend money to tear down their faregates and adopt Proof of payment, spending money to make it easier to avoid paying the fare? Indeed if you can get most of your passengers/city reaching two yeses then your casual evasion will be well below a level worth caring about.. So Caltrain is transitioning the GoPass to require tagging on and off (Caltrain uses ~12.5-mile fixed fare zones as a super chunky proxy for more equitable true distance-based fares) which will for the first time yield a cornucopia of data about GoPass use (station pairs, time of day, day of week, how often and by which employees of which program participants, etc.). JT September (2017). If they decide to prosecute, you will receive a Court Summons in the post, providing a date when you must attend court. Webthe district court abused its discretion in denying his motion to amend the complaint to add a claim for punitive damages. Some people will learn to dodge the inspectors, as is the case in Berlin, and thats fine; the point is not to get fare evasion to 0%, but to the minimum level net of enforcement costs. Paris recently eliminated the zone restriction on certain Navigo cards thus reducing, in the most significant means, the previous disadvantage of those living further out and often less economically advantaged. Whilst I thoroughly enjoyed my travels in both countries, I was astounded by the cost of regional trains and bus and tube transport in the UK.