self determination theory in the workplace self determination theory in the workplace

The z-score enables the comparison and in this instance combination, of two scores that are from different distributions and/or scales. (Ed.) The interpersonal approach of leaders, the way they communicate and relate to their followers, is considered paramount in creating a need-supportive climate and shaping motivation in an organization (Deci et al., 1989). Having close friends at work has a positive impact on peoples experience and satisfaction in their job and colleagues provide an important source of basic psychological needs satisfaction and motivation in the workplace (Jungert et al., 2018; Moreau and Mageau, 2012). Another key strategy to support competence and promote motivation is through offering regular positive and constructive feedback. Sun, L.Y., Zhang, Z., Qi, J. and Chen, Z.X. Leaders in the present study support autonomy by inviting others into the decision-making process and consulting with those who will implement or be affected by others decisions. A workers need for relatedness is satisfied when they feel part of the group and have supportive relationships and friends at work. Self-determination theory: a macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. The elicited list items are then analysed together and salience of each item is calculated. Investigation of the phenomenon of SDT application in the present research is, therefore, constrained within the boundaries of the participants and their context. (2008). Next, the leaders completed a nine-week on-the-job learning program. Positive feedback or praise, relative to no feedback or negative feedback, is especially motivating and has been linked to higher levels of well-being, task interest and ongoing participation in the activity (Deci et al., 1999; Mouratidis, 2008). Various methods have been proposed to combine experts ratings (Uebersax, 1993). By using standard scores, practical salience and theoretical fit had equal weighting when summed to produce the combined score. This study is the first draw upon the lived experience of practitioners, specifically organizational leaders, who have operationalized the theory into actions and have personally applied SDT in their organization. We have natural tendencies to want to learn, grow, master our environments, and integrate new experiences into who we are (you'll often hear me talk about "work/life integration" rather than "work/life balance".) Motivation and Emotion, 36(3), pp. SDT (Deci and Ryan, 1985) is an influential theory of motivation in the twenty-first century that is concerned with understanding how to facilitate and sustain high quality motivation. She provides information on the context and desired outcome and seeks suggestions for suitable milestones from the volunteer. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), pp. New York: Guilford, 2017. and Barclay, W.B. 3-29, doi: 10.1111/apps.12110. (2009). 373-400. doi: 10.1177/1534484305281769. However, This may reflect the contextual challenges of supporting autonomy in an organizational setting. This scenario also demonstrates a strategy for supporting autonomy. Competence represented the largest portion of examples (48%) submitted by leaders in this study. Ryan, R.M. and Graham, I.D. (2017). Carpentier, J. and Mageau, G.A. Self-Determination Theory in the Workplace Existing theory and research on employee motivation identify needs as innate aspects of individuals that drive behavior in the workplace. ple dichotomy between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation made the theory difcult to apply to work settings. (1985). (2020), "Motivating workers: how leaders apply self-determination theory in organizations", Organization Management Journal , Vol. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), pp. 6). Josh has never been near a flood boat and now wants to be a flood boat operator. Why is self-determination important in the workplace? Learning more about determination can help you progress in your career and motivate you to accept many workplace challenges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), pp. This may indicate that leaders are more experienced in this area or that this element of SDT was more readily understood. Autonomously motivated employees engage in their work with a full sense of willingness, understand the worth and purpose of their job and are self-determined in carrying out work tasks (Ryan and Deci, 2017). We collected two waves of data from 239 Chinese employees. Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. Paying for performance: Incentive pay schemes and employees financial participation. Learning about the interests and circumstances of others provides opportunities to find common ground. Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, 65, pp. Higher combined scores indicate that the submission has strong practical significance and theoretical fit. Journal of Personality, 62(1), pp. British Journal of Management, 12(s1), pp. reading to earn a grade) motivators (Ryan & Deci, 2000). Academy of Management Review, 31(4), pp. The free-listing activity for the present study followed the generalized protocol and was facilitated as a face-to-face group session. Data for this present study were collected from leaders at the end of the nine-week intervention using the free-listing methodology (Quinlan, 2019). Causal inferences between participation in decision making, task attributes, work effort, rewards, job satisfaction and commitment. A recent meta-analysis of 99 studies reported that each of the three needs predicted lower turnover intention and were associated with higher job satisfaction, engagement and affective commitment (Van den Broeck et al., 2016). (2009). SDT delineates the social-contextual factors, including leaders' interpersonal style, that predict high quality motivation in the workplace ( Deci et al., 2017 ). 2022 Oct;38(4) :790-803. . Each case scenario is accompanied by a theoretical interpretation, highlighting the basic psychological needs being supported. Examples of SDT application were proposed by 51 leaders, who had learned and personally applied SDT with their own followers in the workplace. Ryan, R.M. The book . Mentoring may be formal, such as a structured program that pairs organizational members together or informally occurring across team members and networks of workers spontaneously (Higgins and Kram, 2001). 165-184. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2419.2009.00325.x. When leaders are open to their workers ideas and suggestions and provide a safe environment for people to express their opinions, they send a clear signal that innovation and creativity are encouraged (Ye et al., 2019). . Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications. (1994). Kipp, L. & Amarose, A. 28-40. Self-determination theory (SDT) (Ryan and Deci, 2019) is a prominent theory of motivation that offers leaders an evidence-based framework for how to effectively motivate workers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(10), 2045-2068, doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02690.x. 421-427, doi: 10.2307/2290320. 1-3. 24-28. PWD is defined as the proactive cognitive-behavioral orientation to work activities that employees utilize to (1) design fun and (2) design competition ( Scharp et al., 2019 ). Berings, M.G.M.C., Poell, R.F. The theoretical fit rating across the three experts were therefore aggregated to produce a mean theoretical fit score. Self-determination theory and work motivation. Handbook of research methods in health social sciences, Singapore: Springer. (2011). The need for relatedness is satisfied when people experience a sense of belonging and develop intimate relationships with others (Ryan and Deci, 2000). Do intrinsic and extrinsic motivation relate differently to employee outcomes? Training corporate managers to adopt a more autonomy-supportive motivating style toward employees: an intervention study. Intrinsic need satisfaction and the job attitudes of volunteers versus employees working in a charitable volunteer organization, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(4), pp. Gerstner, C.R. SDT literature in the work domain has focused primarily on theoretical testing, measurement of SDT-related constructs and investigating the models nomological network (Deci et al., 2017; Gagn and Deci, 2005; Ryan and Deci, 2019; Van den Broeck et al., 2016). Third, suggestions are made . Weller, S.C. and Romney, A.K. Article publication date: 14 December 2020. SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY SDT is a macro theory of human motivation that has been successfully applied across domains including parenting, education, healthcare, sports and physical activity, psychotherapy, and virtual worlds, as well as the fields of work motivation and management ( Deci & Ryan 1985a, Ryan & Deci 2017 ). The use of freelisting to elicit stakeholder understanding of the benefits sought from healthcare buildings. People can generally be motivated by outside factors such as money, acclaim, and fame, and this type of motivation is known as extrinsic . Next, they rated, on a scale from 1 (very weak fit) to 5 (strongly aligned to theory), the strength of that fit to the theory. Journal of General Management, 34(3), pp. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior, New York, NY: Plenum. Communicating feedback in a supportive way involves being empathetic, acknowledging the followers feelings and difficulties and inviting them to provide their own views (Carpentier and Mageau, 2013; Ryan and Deci, 2000). Work structures . Li, L.C., Grimshaw, J.M., Nielsen, C., Judd, M., Coyte, P.C. At the next team meeting, he invites suggestions for social event ideas and suitable dates from the members. Offering ownership of a task empowers the follower and enables them to unleash their ideas, provide input and drive the direction of the organization. In that respect, this chapter makes a contribution to the field of TAD, and the emerging field of self-determination theory (SDT) research in the domain of work, by reviewing TAD research using SDT as a theoretical framework. In the generalized free-listing protocol (Bousfield and Barclay, 1950; Thomson et al.,2012) participants are directed to list as many items that come to mind within a constrained time-period. Indeed, it can be observed that the term autonomy is included within many theoretically distinct SDT constructs including, for example, autonomy: a basic psychological need (Van den Broeck et al., 2016), autonomy orientation: an individual difference in causality orientation (Hagger and Chatzisarantis, 2011) and, autonomy-support: an interpersonal style (Slemp et al., 2018). Kram, K.E. We propose that building knowledge and conceptual clarification about SDT application by leaders is a desirable outcome for both academics and practitioners and, therefore, much can be gained by coupling both parties in a task of mutual knowledge building. 240-268, doi: 10.1123/jsep.30.2.240. Ye, Q., Wang, D. and Guo, W. (2019). 29-42. and Salas, E. (2017). The need for relatedness is satisfied when workers develop close relationships in the workplace and see themselves as part of the group (Van den Broeck et al., 2016). In contrast, when a persons basic psychological needs are not met their motivation deteriorates and becomes controlled. A study of job motivation, satisfaction, and performance among bank employees. (2014). 268-286, doi: 10.1007/s11031-011-9250-9. Specifically, factors have been examined that enhance versus undermine intrinsic motivation, self-regulation, and well-being. For example, Boezeman and Ellemers (2009) examined the way in which volunteers derive their job satisfaction and intent to remain. For the purpose of SDT and work motivation, motivation is considered the core of biological, cognitive, and social regulation. 2, pp. 73-92. doi: 10.5465/amp.2011.0140. (1985). For example, leaders can facilitate on-the-job learning opportunities by providing optimally challenging workplace assignments, offering team members opportunities to take on new tasks, letting someone lead a project or providing an opportunity to take on increased responsibilities (Berings et al., 2005). Controlled behaviours are contingent on reward, power dynamics or driven by internal pressure such as guilt or to maintain self-esteem. The outcome will be a training package developed by volunteers themselves which could be shared with neighbouring units. and Simons, P.R.J. University of Rochester. Leaders are important role models of group expectations and may support diversity by respecting and valuing the unique strengths that members bring to the group and discussing the value and opportunities that can be realized through increased diversity. Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life, Lanham: University Press of America. Basic need satisfaction, work motivation, and job performance in an industrial company in Iran, Paper presented at the Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. When assigning tasks to members of the team, leaders can support autonomy and intrinsic motivation by avoiding controlling or enforcing language, such as must or should (Ryan, 1982) and instead invite workers to decide how they go about achieving the task assigned to them. These needs are universal, but vary in intensity depending on the context; some will be more important than others at particular times during our lives. and Gardner, D.G. Implementation Science, 4(1), pp. 827-844, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827. (1982). S61-S70. Competence represents workers need to feel effective, successful and that they are good at their job (Van den Broeck et al., 2010). 97-121). Leaders and managers play a pivotal role in shaping motivation in the workplace and facilitating these beneficial outcomes (Graves and Luciano, 2010; Miniotait and Buinien, 2013; Oostlander et al., 2014). (2018). Leaders sustain and enhance motivation, creativity and innovation by listening to workers suggestions and empowering then to action their ideas or at least explore them further (Liu et al., 2011; Sun et al., 2012). Leadership training design, delivery, and implementation: a meta-analysis, Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(12), pp. The scenario also demonstrates how a leader may balance followers autonomy with organizational requirements. The SDT-informed management strategies are discussed in relation to the literature and alongside case scenarios to illustrate approaches for integrating elements of SDT into day-to-day management activities. After the course the mentor does some practical exercises with him and supports him on the job. Rather, leaders might take time to understand the individual development interests and needs of their team members and involve them in devising ideas and suggestions for their own learning and development activities. and Isabella, L.A. (1985). Overall, SDTs basic psychological needs have substantial application value because they offer leaders a simple framework outlining the conditions that promote high quality motivation and beneficial outcomes among their workers. More. A disconnect between theory and practice (Van De Ven and Johnson, 2006; Zaccaro and Horn, 2003) within SDT research is currently limiting leaders from diffusing this valuable knowledge into managerial practice. In contrast, feedback that conveys external pressure focuses on enforcing rules and uses language such as should or must is controlling and undermines motivation (Ryan, 1981). Ryan, Richard M., and Edward L. Deci. Deci, E.L., Koestner, R. and Ryan, R.M. It identifies three key psychological elements that must exist for people to have optimal personal and psychological growth to achieve self-determination: Journal of Management, 30(5), pp. The current disconnect presents a problem for managers, HR professionals and fellow academics seeking to use SDT to solve real business problems because there is limited empirical guidance to help them operationalize the theory clearly, within the complexities of strategic organizations and to take appropriate and effective action. Choice making is an individual's ability to express their preference between two or more options (Wehmeyer, 2005) and exert control over their actions and environment. autonomy, competence or relatedness). Beneficial outcomes of need satisfaction have also been found in studies conducted within the volunteer context (Haivas et al., 2012). Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(4), pp. The importance of inducting or onboarding new members into the team is also emphasized. The small portion of submissions focusing on autonomy may suggest it is more challenging for leaders to implement this element of the theory as they must find a way to balance autonomy with organizational requirements. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. Journal of Organisational behaviour, 26. The volume . 331-362. 289-303, doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.02.005. The leaders developed their free lists in small groups of up to five people per group. Responding to calls (Bansal et al., 2012; Gregory and Anderson, 2006; Van de Ven, 2007) for research studies to shift from a logic of building practice from theory to one of building theory from practice (Schultz and Hatch, 2005, p. 337), this study taps into the valuable knowledge and experiences of practitioners to extend and develop SDT to have enhanced validity and relevance in an applied setting. Day, J.K. and Fitton, G.D. (2008). Further to supporting basic psychological needs for relatedness, relationship building practices by leaders have other positive outcomes such as improved team effectiveness, job performance and engagement (Dunst et al., 2018). Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenskiste, M., Witte, H.D., Soenens, B. and Lens, W. (2010). Managerial behaviors and subordinates health: an opportunity for reducing employee healthcare costs, Proceedings of the Northeast Business and Economics Association, pp. In other words, motivation is the driving force toward human behaviour. Leader autonomy support in the workplace: A meta-analytic review. Bansal, P., Bertels, S., Ewart, T., Macconnachie, P. and OBrien, J. 468-480, doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2019.01.006. (2012). Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates, Answers to the most commonly asked questions here. Oostlander, J., Guentert, S.T., van Schie, S. and Wehner, T. (2014). Drive: the surprising truth about what motivates us, New York, NY: Riverhead Books. Motivation allows us to make personal choices based on . These needs include, among others: Competence - An individual's desire to be respected at work for the skills they possess and the work they produce. Elsevier. Two examples submitted by leaders included encourage innovation and provide workers with opportunities to express their ideas. 1195-1229, doi: 10.1177/0149206316632058. The motivation at work scale: Validation evidence in two languages. Gagn, M., Forest, J., Gilbert, M.H., Aub, C., Morin, E. and Malorni, A. Self-determination theory looks at the ways that intrinsic and extrinsic motivation play a role in our self-determination and the fulfillment of three basic human needs. (2011). Homan, A.C., Gndemir, S., Buengeler, C. and van Kleef, G.A. (2004). Pierce, J.L. Let's start with understanding these needs with a few strategies by which we can satisfy that need to increase employee well-being: 1. Free-listing practical salience score analysis exposes commonalities in the collective understanding of a domain and items that are most important or salient within the culture/group (Quinlan, 2019; Thomson et al., 2012). Individual behaviour is motivated by the dominant role of intrinsic motives. Self-esteem within the work and organizational context: a review of the organization-based self-esteem literature. SDT literature in the work domain has focused primarily on (2019). ), The oxford handbook of work engagement, motivation and Self-Determination theory, New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Motivation often decreases when core psychological needs have not been met. Self-determination theory (SDT) is an empirically derived theory of human motivation and personality in social contexts that differentiates motivation in terms of being autonomous and controlled. They were advised that the examples would be shared with other practising leaders to help illuminate how SDT is applied in organizations. For example, social activities, such as team lunches or events, provide opportunities for new team members to interact in a relaxed and informal environment. The participating leaders were provided with information about the purpose of the activity and instructed to list strategies and actions detailing what leaders [] can do to apply SDT and create an optimally motivating climate for their follower. Self-Determination Theory posits that three basic psychological needs must be met for an individual to feel motivated and engaged in their pursuits: autonomy, competence, and relatedness.. Klein, H.J., Polin, B. and Leigh Sutton, K. (2015). and Anderson, B.B. (2009). Joakim is also interested in teaching improvement and innovation. Table 3 presents the five practical examples, proposed by organizational leaders and managers, for how leaders support workers basic psychological need for relatedness. For example, sticking to a diet requires high levels of self determination. An exploration of the controlling and informational components of interpersonal and intrapersonal communications (Unpublished doctoral disseration). Participative or consultative decision-making satisfies peoples need for autonomy by providing a platform for them to express their ideas and feelings, as well as having input and some control in their work activities. Self-Determination Theory, or SDT, links personality, human motivation, and optimal functioning. How colleagues can support each others needs and motivation: an intervention on employee work motivation. cal mechanisms by which workplace rewards might elicit employees' contribution and loy-alty to their workplace.21 To begin to answer this critical question, we propose using the claims of self-determination theory (SDT).22 Stemming from social psychology, SDT pro-vides a theoretical framework for understand- Beyond talk: Creating autonomous motivation through self-determination theory. Leadership and volunteer motivation: a study using self-determination theory. SDT is based on foundational work by Angyal 1972, and early work in personality psychology, which framed an organismic approach to understanding human behavior and on de Charms . Strategic Organization, 3(3), p. 337. doi: 10.1177/1476127005055795. Overall, both the type of feedback (positive vs negative) and the way in which it is delivered impacts upon peoples competence and motivation (Mabbe et al., 2018). Firstly, a practical salience score was derived for each submission. Gagn, M., Forest, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Crevier-Braud, L., Van den Broeck, A., Aspeli, A.K., Bellerose, J., Benabou, C., Chemolli, E., Gntert, S.T. The biggest advantage of Self-Determination Theory is the awareness that it provides. Fernet, C. and Austin, S. (2014). Effects of LMX on employee attitudes: the role of need satisfaction and autonomous motivation, Paper presented at the Academy of Management 2010 Annual Meeting Dare to Care: Passion and Compassion in Management Practice and Research, AOM. In contrast, very little empirical attention has been paid to examining how the theory is applied, interpreted and/or used by practitioners in real world settings. Ryan, R.M. Support for competence is also evident in this scenario. Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), pp. Forner, V.W., Jones, M., Berry, Y. and Eidenfalk, J. Higgins, M.C. 769-806, doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.009. 1686-1718, doi: 10.1037/apl000024110.1037/apl0000241.supp. (2018). Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. Personal causation: the internal affective determinants of behaviour, New York, NY: Academic Press. A theoretic interpretation is presented alongside each scenario to highlight where support for autonomy, competence and relatedness feature within the case. Firstly, the data reflects the personal experiences of a distinct case of organizational leaders. Cultural Anthropology Methods, 5(3), pp. The focus of Scenario 2 is autonomy. Once you realize how important competence, relatedness and autonomy are to motivation and performance, you can take steps to ensure that your needs are being met. For example, the more senior worker is provided with an opportunity to demonstrate and be valued for their skills and experience while the junior member benefits by developing new skills and building their knowledge and capabilities. Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: correlates and construct issues. To investigate the phenomenon of SDT-based leadership the research asks: how do leaders apply SDT, when carrying out their day-to-day managerial functions, to support workers needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness? The strategies discussed in this paper offer guidance for those seeking to implement the theory in their organization. The impact of organizational factors on psychological needs and their relations with well-being. The results showed that when volunteers experience the satisfaction of autonomy and relatedness needs during their volunteer work, they are more satisfied with their volunteer job and that this, in turn, enhances their intent to remain a volunteer with the volunteer organization. Differentiating extrinsic motivation into types that differ in their degree of autonomy led to self-determination theory, which has received widespread attention in the education, health care, and sport domains. The participants in this study, for example, led organizations where workers must adhere to strict safety procedures specifying how they must carry out their tasks. (1911). Design/methodology/approach: First, the models for embedding workplace learning in the curriculum are described and analysed. 1. When workers basic psychological needs are met they are more likely to be autonomously motivated, that is they are personally invested in their work tasks and engage in their work activities willingly (Deci and Ryan, 2014; Van den Broeck et al., 2016). (2008). Hughes, D.J., Lee, A., Tian, A.W., Newman, A. and Legood, A. Overview of self-determination theory. Self-determination theory (SDT) is concerned with human motivation and personality. Finally, the last lecture examines work and organizations and discusses how . Her research focuses on leadership, motivation and workplace contexts that promote human well-being and thriving. and Vansteenkiste, M. (2018). (2016). Autonomy refers to workers need to experience choice in their role, have the freedom to make decisions, express their ideas and have input in deciding how their tasks get done. Conceptualizing on-the-job learning styles. Two examples provided by leaders included provide development and learning opportunities and let team members learn at their own pace. 134-160, doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.01.008. A review of self-determination theorys basic psychological needs at work. (2019). These three needs. Bousfield, W.A. Self-determination theory focuses on the interplay between the extrinsic forces acting on persons and the intrinsic motive and needs of human beings. Leadership training design, delivery, and implementation: a meta-analysis, 10.1037/apl000024110.1037/apl0000241.supp, Evolution of wengers concept of community of practice, From autonomy to creativity: A multilevel investigation of the mediating role of harmonious passion, The impact of feedback valence and communication style on intrinsic motivation in middle childhood: Experimental evidence and generalization across individual differences, Explaining authentic leadership work outcomes from the perspective of self-determination theory, Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, The importance of perceived autonomy support for the psychological health and work satisfaction of health professionals: not only supervisors count, colleagues too, The motivating role of positive feedback in sport and physical education: evidence for a motivational model, Leadership and volunteer motivation: a study using self-determination theory, Self-esteem within the work and organizational context: a review of the organization-based self-esteem literature, Drive: the surprising truth about what motivates us, Handbook of research methods in health social sciences, An exploration of the controlling and informational components of interpersonal and intrapersonal communications, Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory, Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being, Self-Determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness, Chapter four brick by brick: The origins, development, and future of self-determination theory, Causal inferences between participation in decision making, task attributes, work effort, rewards, job satisfaction and commitment, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Autonomous motivation and well-being: As alternative approach to workplace stress management, New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations, Leader autonomy support in the workplace: A meta-analytic review, Using ANTHOPAC 3.5 and a spread-sheet to compute a free-list salience index, A study of job motivation, satisfaction, and performance among bank employees, Beyond talk: Creating autonomous motivation through self-determination theory, Empowerment and creativity: A cross-level investigation, The use of freelisting to elicit stakeholder understanding of the benefits sought from healthcare buildings, Statistical modeling of expert ratings on medical treatment appropriateness, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing, Engaged scholarship: a guide for organizational and social research, A review of self-determination theorys basic psychological needs at work, Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the work-related basic need satisfaction scale, On the relations among work value orientations, psychological need satisfaction and job outcomes: A self-determination theory approach, On the mutuality of human motivation and relationships, Human motivation and interpersonal relationships: Theory, research, and application, Systematic data collection: Qualitative research methods, Inclusive leadership and team innovation: The role of team voice and performance pressure, Leadership theory and practice: Fostering an effective symbiosis, http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode, www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/executive-remuneration/submissions/sub089.pdf, https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1693&context=theses1, www.worldatwork.org/docs/surveys/Survey%20Brief%20-%202017%20Incentive%20Pay%20Practices-%20Privately%20Held%20Compaies.pdf?language_id=1, Consult with those who are affected by your decisions, Provide workers opportunities to express their ideas, Provide a rationale for decisions where possible, Provide development/learning opportunities, Support and help build self-esteem and confidence, Offer regular positive and constructive feedback, Let team members learn at their own individual pace, Learn about workers outside of the work context, Know your team members names, interests and skills, Respect others background and experience.